Main Article Content
Open science provides transparency to research processes by means of open data as data sharing initiates. The need for data sharing among scholars and researchers was evident, the uptake however is slow due to the benefits and detriments of the practices. This paper explores the perceptions of Nigerian academics towards research data sharing practices. Participants from five universities in Nigeria were purposively sampled. Data were gathered through interviews with 22 participants. Their perception towards data sharing was reflected through their awareness, understanding and familiarity of the practice. Most of the participants perceived that data sharing would add value to their professional reputation and fast-track their research progression, however a few of them perceived data sharing as disquieting. The academics labelled data privacy and cultural orientation to be those risks associated with data sharing. The study provides deeper understanding of data sharing and the opportunity for academics to know diverse insights of data sharing practices that would guide scholars in intensifying a variety of data management services, which then can be personalized to their exclusive needs. Further investigation could be done through quantitative research approach to inform data sharing behavior in a larger scale in order to improve the current practices.
It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.
Amann, R. I., Baichoo, S., Blencowe, B. J., Bork, P., Borodovsky, M., Brooksbank, C., Chain, P.S., Colwell, R.R., Daffonchio, D.G., Danchin, A., de Lorenzo, V. ...... and Xenarios, I. 2019. Toward unrestricted use of public genomic data. Science, Vol. 363, no. 6425: 350-352. Available at: doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/571729.
Anggawira, D. and Mayesti, N. 2020. The Indonesian National Scientific Repository: A Case Study of Research Data Sharing. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, Vol. 49, 1: 14-25. Available at: https://doi: 10.1515/pdtc-2019-0015.
Angraal, S., Ross, J. S., Dhruva, S. S., Desai, N. R., Welsh, J. W. and Krumholz, H. M. 2017. Merits of data sharing: the digitalis investigation group trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 70, 14: 1825-1827.
Banks, G. C., Field, J. G., Oswald, F. L., O’Boyle, E. H., Landis, R. S., Rupp, D. E. and Rogelberg, S. G. 2019. Answers to 18 questions about open science practices.
Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 34, no. 3: 257-270. Available at: doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9547-8.
Bartlett, G., Macgibbon, B., Rubinowicz, A., Nease, C., Dawes, M. and Tamblyn, R. 2018. The importance of relevance: Willingness to share eHealth data for family medicine research. Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 4, 6: 255. Available at: doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00255.
Bauchner, H., Golub, R. M. and Fontanarosa, P. B. 2016. Data sharing: An ethical and scientific imperative. JAMA, Vol. 315, no. 12: 1238-1240.
Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Wu, Z. S., Williams, C., Lee, R., Bhavnani, S. P., Byrd, J. B. and Greene, C. S. 2019. Privacy-preserving generative deep neural networks support clinical data sharing. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, Vol. 12, no. 7: e005122. Available at: doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005122.
Bezuidenhout, L. and Chakauya, E. 2018. Hidden concerns of sharing research data by low/middle-income country scientists. Global Bioethics, Vol. 29, no. 1: 39-54. Available at: doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2018.144178.
Bezuidenhout, L. 2019. To share or not to share: Incentivizing data sharing in life science communities. Developing World Bioethics, Vol. 19, no. 1: 18-24. Available at: doi.org/10.1111/ dewb.12183.
Bierer, B. E., Crosas, M. and Pierce, H. H. 2017. Data authorship as an incentive to data sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 376:1684-1687. Available at: doi.10.1056/NEJMsb1616595.
Borgman, C. L. 2012. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63, no. 6: 1059-1078.
Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2015. Business research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Callahan, A., Anderson, K. D., Beattie,M S., Bixby, J. L., Ferguson, A. R., Fouad, K., Jakeman, L.B., Nielson, J.L., Popovich, P.G., Schwab, J.M., Lemmon, V.P. and FAIR Share Workshop Participants. 2017. Developing a data sharing community for spinal cord injury research, Experimental Neurology, Vol. 295: 135-143. Available at: doi: 10.1016/ j.expneurol.2017.05.012.
Carroll, M. W. 2015. Sharing research data and intellectual property law: A primer. PLoS Biology, Vol. 13, no. 8: e1002235.
Chawinga, W. D. and Zinn, S. 2019. Global perspectives of research data sharing: A systematic literature review. Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 41, no. 2: 109-122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.004.
Chen, J., Ping, J. W., Xu, Y. C. and Tan, B. C. 2015. Information privacy concern about peer disclosure in online social networks. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 62, no. 3: 311-324.
Cordelia, N. 1994. Women in Nigeria's teaching profession: The challenges ahead. The Vocational Aspect of Education, Vol. 46, no. 2: 167-180. Available at: doi: 10.1080/0305787940460206.
Curty, R. G., Crowston, K., Specht, A., Grant, B. W. and Dalton, E. D. 2017. Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PloS One, Vol. 12, no. 12: e0189288.
Doshi, P., Jefferson, T. and Del Mar, C. 2012. The imperative to share clinical study reports: recommendations from the Tamiflu experience. PLoS Medicine, Vol. 9, no. 4: e1001201.
Dougherty, M. R., Slevc, L. R. and Grand, J. A. 2019. Making research evaluation more transparent: Aligning research philosophy, institutional values, and reporting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 14, no. 3: 361-375. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810693.
Dreyfus, J. C. and Sobel, M. E. 2018. Concern about justifying the release of genomic data as a civil right. The American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 103, no. 1: 163-165. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.06.003.
Eastwood, J. D., and Smilek, D. 2005. Functional consequences of perceiving facial expressions of emotion without awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 14, no. 3: 565-584. Available at: doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.01.001.
Ebrahim, S., Sohani, Z. N., Montoya, L., Agarwal, A., Thorlund, K., Mills, E. J. and Ioannidis, J. P. 2014. Reanalyses of randomized clinical trial data. JAMA, Vol. 312, .10: 1024-1032.
Elliott, K. C., Cheruvelil, K. S., Montgomery, G. M. and Soranno, P. A. 2016. Conceptions of good science in our data-rich world. BioScience, Vol. 66, no. 10: 880-889.
Enke, N., Thessen, A., Bach, K., Bendix, J., Seeger, B., and Gemeinholzer, B. 2012. The user's view on biodiversity data sharing—Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data. Ecological Informatics, Vol. 11: 25-33. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.004.
Fecher, B., Friesike, S. and Hebing, M. 2015. What drives academic data sharing? PloS One, Vol. 10, no. 2: e0118053.
Feldman, S. and Shaw, L. 2019. The epistemological and ethical challenges of archiving and sharing qualitative data. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 63, no. 6: 699-721. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218796084.
Groves, R. M. 2018. The promise of collaborative data sharing across research sectors. The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.100 7/978-3-319-54395-6_38.
Hesse, B. W. 2018. Can psychology walk the walk of open science? American Psychologist, Vol. 73, no. 2: 126-137. Available at: doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000197.
Higman, R. and Pinfield, S. 2015. Research data management and openness: The role of data sharing in developing institutional policies and practices. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol. 49, no. 4: 364-381.
James, T. L., Wallace, L., Warkentin, M., Kim, B. C. and Collignon, S. E. 2017. Exposing others’ information on online social networks (OSNs): Perceived shared risk, its determinants, and its influence on OSN privacy control use. Information & Management, Vol. 54, no. 7: 851-865.
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y. and Zuiderwijk, A. 2012. Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, Vol. 29, no. 4: 258-268.
Kim, J., Lee, C., and Elias, T. 2015. Factors affecting information sharing in social networking sites amongst university students: Application of the knowledge-sharing model to social networking sites. Online Information Review, Vol 39, no. 3: 290-309. Available at: doi 10.1108/OIR-01-2015-0022.
Kim, Y. and Stanton, J. M. 2012. Institutional and individual influences on scientists’ data sharing practices. Journal of Computational Science Education, Vol. 3, no. 1: 47-56.
Kim, Y. and Stanton, J. M. 2013. Institutional and individual influences on scientists' data sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001093.
Kim, Y. and Stanton, J. M. 2016. Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data‐sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, no. 4: 776-799.
King, G. 2011. Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science, Vol. 331, no. 6018: 719-721. Available at: doi:10.1126/science.1197872.
Knoppers, B. M., Harris, J. R., Tassé, A. M., Budin-Ljøsne, I., Kaye, J., Deschênes, M. and Ma'n, H. Z. 2011. Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research. Genome Medicine, Vol.3, no. 7: 46. doi.org/10.1186/gm262.
Kraemer Diaz, A. E., Spears Johnson, C. R. and Arcury, T. A. 2015. Perceptions that influence the maintenance of scientific integrity in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, Vol. 42, no. 3: 393-401.
Lewandowsky, S. 2018. Open data: Balancing transparency with resilience. Paper presented at the Ethical Aspects of Open Access: A Windy Road Workshop, Brussels, Germany, 1 February 2018. 20. Available at: https://www.alea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/SLewandowsky open data-balancing-transparency with-Resilience pdf.
Linek, S. B., Fecher, B., Friesike, S. and Hebing, M. 2017. Data sharing as social dilemma: Influence of the researcher’s personality. PLOS One, Vol. 12, no. 8: e0183216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0183216
Locke, E. A. and Schattke, K. 2018. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and clarification. Motivation Science, Vol. 5, no. 4: 277-290. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000116.
Longo, D. L. and Drazen, J. M. 2016. Data sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 374: 276-277. Available at: doi.: 10.1056/NEJMe1516564.
Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M. and Campbell, E. G. 2002. Macroscope: Sharing in science. American Scientist, Vol. 90, no. 4: 304-307. Available at: https//www.jstor.org/ stable/27857685.
MacMillan, D. 2014. Data sharing and discovery: What librarians need to know. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 40, no. 5: 541-549. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/ j.acalib.2014.06.011.
Madas, B. G. and Schofield, P. N. 2019. Survey on data management in radiation protection research. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 183, no. 1: 233-236. Available at: doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy250.
Mannheimer, S., Pienta, A., Kirilova, D., Elman, C., and Wutich, A. 2019. Qualitative data sharing: Data repositories and academic libraries as key partners in addressing challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 63, no. 5: 643-664. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218784991.
Matacic, C. 2019. Researchers probe jail before trial. Science. Vol. 363, no. 6434: 1374-1375. Available at: doi.10.1126/science.363.6434. 1374.
McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., Spies, J. R. and Soderberg, C. K. 2016. Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed. Elife, 5, e16800.
Merriam, S. B. and Grenier, R. S. 2019. Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Franciso, CA.: John Wiley & Sons.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Perception. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perception.
Meyer, M. N. 2018. Practical tips for ethical data sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, Vol. 1, no. 1: 131-144. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747656.
Miltgen, C. L. and Peyrat-Guillard, D. 2014. Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23, no. 2: 103-125.
Molloy J. C. 2011. The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open data means better science. PLoS Biology, Vol. 9, no 12: e1001195.
Murray- Rust P. 2008. Open data in science. Serials Review, Vol 34, no. 1: 52–64.
Mueller-Langer, F. and Andreoli-Versbach, P. 2018. Open access to research data: Strategic delay and the ambiguous welfare effects of mandatory data disclosure. Information Economics and Policy, Vol 42: 20-34. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/ j.infoecopol.2017.05.004.
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C.D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestsbile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J. .... and Yarkoni, T. 2015. Promoting an open research culture. Science, Vol. 348, no. 6242: 1422-1425.
Odigwe, F.N., Bassey, B.A., and Owan, V.J. 2020. Data management practices and educational research effectiveness of university lecturers in South-South Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research (JESR), Vol 10, no. 3: 24-34. Available at: doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0042.
Ogba, O. C. 2014. The practicality of resource sharing in academic law libraries in South-western Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1120. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1120.
Ogungbeni, J. I., Obiamalu, A. R., Ssemambo, S. and Bazibu, C. M. 2018. The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review. Information Development, Vol. 34, no. 2: 113-121. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/0266666916678444.
O'hara, K. 2019. Data trusts: Ethics, architecture and governance for trustworthy data stewardship. Web Science Institute White Papers. Available at: doi.10.5258/ soton/wsiwp001.
Olson, S. and Downey, A. 2016. Sharing clinical research data: Workshop summary 2013. Paper presented at the Book Sharing Clinical Research Data: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Paxton, A. and Tullett, A. 2019. Open Science in data-intensive psychology and cognitive science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 6, no. 1: 47-55. Available at: doi.org/10.1177/2372732218790283.
Peters, C. and Ho, A. K. 2017. Research data management and sharing. Library Presentations at the CAMTech Industry Advisory Board (IAB) Meeting, Lexington, KY., 174. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_present/174.
Pitt, M. A. and Tang, Y. 2013. What should be the data sharing policy of cognitive science? Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, no. 1: 214-221.
Piwowar, H. A. 2011. Who shares? Who doesn't? Factors associated with openly archiving raw research data. PloS One, Vol. 6, no. 7: e18657.
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S. and Fridsma, D. B. 2007. Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PloS One, Vol 2, no. 3: e308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308.
Polanin, J. R. and Terzian, M. 2019. A data-sharing agreement helps to increase researchers’ willingness to share primary data: results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 106, 60-69. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.006.
Reichman, O. J., Jones, M. B. and Schildhauer, M. P. 2011. Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science, Vol. 331, no. 6018: 703-705. Available at: 10.1126/science.1197962.
Riccardi, E., Pantano, S. and Potestio, R. 2019. Envisioning data sharing for the biocomputing community. Interface Focus, Vol. 9, no 3: 20190005. Available at: doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2019.0005.
Riggs, E. R., Azzariti, D. R., Niehaus, A., Goehringer, S. R., Ramos, E. M., Rodriguez, L. L., Bartha Knoppers, K., Heidi L. and Martin, C. L. 2019. Development of a consent resource for genomic data sharing in the clinical setting. Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 21, no 1: 81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0017-5.
Ross, M. W., Iguchi, M. Y. and Panicker, S. 2018. Ethical aspects of data sharing and research participant protections. American Psychologist, Vol. 73, no 2: 138. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000240.
Salami, A. and Suhaimi, M. A. 2019. The adoption of knowledge management systems (kms) among academicians in nigeria universities. Journal of Information Systems and Digital Technologies, Vol. 1, no. 1: 47-64. Available at: https://journals.iium.edu.my/ kict/index.php/jisdt/article/view/81.
Savage, C. J. and Vickers, A. J. 2009. Empirical study of data sharing by authors publishing in PLoS journals. PloS One, Vol. 4, no. 9: e7078.
Shen, Y. 2016. Research data sharing and reuse practices of academic faculty researchers: A study of the Virginia Tech data landscape. International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol. 10, no. 2: 157-175.
Stein, L. D. 2008. Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences: progress, visions and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol 9, no. 9: 678-688.
Sturges, M. 2015. Supporting child participation in the early years of education. Journal of Education and Educational Development, Vol. 2, no. 1: 17-29.
Spallek, H., Weinberg, S., Manz, M., Nanayakkara, S., Zhou, X. and Johnson, L. 2019. Perceptions and Attitudes toward data sharing among dental researchers. JDR Clinical & Translational Research, Vol. 4, no. 1: 68-75. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/2380084418790451.
Sui, D. 2014. Opportunities and impediments for open GIS. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 18, no. 1: 1-24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12075.
Taichman, D. B., Backus, J., Baethge, C., Bauchner, H., De Leeuw, P. W., Drazen, J. M., Fletcher, J., Frizelle, F. A., Grove, T., Haileamlak, A., James, A., Laine, C., Peiperl, L., Pinborg, A., Sahni, P., and Wu, S. 2016. Sharing clinical trial data: A proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 164, no. 7: 505-506. Available at : https:// doi. org/10.7326/M15-2928.
Tannenbaum, S., Ross, J. S., Krumholz, H. M., Desai, N. R., Ritchie, J. D., Lehman, R., Gamble, G. M., Bachand, J., Schroter, S., Groves, T. and Gross, C. P. 2018. Early experiences with journal data sharing policies: A survey of published clinical trial investigators. Annals of Internal Medicine. Vol. 169, no. 8: 586-588. Available at : https://doi.org/ 10.7326/M18-0723.
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M. and Frame, M. 2011. Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions. PloS One. Vol. 6, no. 6: e21101. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal. pone.0021101.
Tincani, M. and Travers, J. 2019. Replication research, publication bias, and applied behavior analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, Vol. 42, no. 1: 59-75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0079-0.
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J. and Van Petegem, P. 2017. Teachers’ decision-making: Data based or intuition driven? International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 83: 75-83. Available at: doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.013
Van den Eynden, V., Corti, L., Woollard, M., Bishop, L., and Horton, L. 2011. Managing and sharing data: Best practice for researchers. Colchester, UK: UK Data Archive. Available at: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/2156/1/managingsharing.pdf.
Van Panhuis, W. G., Paul, P., Emerson, C., Grefenstette, J., Wilder, R., Herbst, A. J., Heymann, D.and Burke, D. S. 2014. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health, Vol. 14, no. 1: 1-9.
Veletsianos, G. 2015. A case study of scholars’ open and sharing practices. Open Praxis, Vol. 7, no. 3: 199-209.
Vickers, A. J. 2011. Making raw data more widely available. BMJ, Vol. 342 :d2323 d2323. Available at: doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2323.
Waithira, N., Mutinda, B. and Cheah, P. Y. 2019. Data management and sharing policy: The first step towards promoting data sharing. BMC Medicine. Vol. 17 no. 1: 80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1315-8.
Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E. and Borgman, C. L. 2013. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PloS One, Vol. 8, no. 7: e67332.
Williamson, K., Kennan, M. A., Johanson, G. and Weckert, J. 2016. Data sharing for the advancement of science: Overcoming barriers for citizen scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, no. 10: 2392-2403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23564.
Zenk-Möltgen, W., Akdeniz, E., Katsanidou, A., Naßhoven, V. and Balaban, E. 2018. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 74, no. 5: 1053-1073. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126.
Zhao, Q. 2017. Reasoning with awareness and for awareness: Realizing an aware system using an expert system. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine, Vol. 3, no. 2: 35-38.
Zheutlin, A. R. and Byrd, J. B. 2018. Opening opportunities with open data. JACC: Heart Failure, Vol. 6, no. 6: 530-532. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2017.12.019.
Zinner, D. E., Pham-Kanter, G. and Campbell, E. G. 2016. The changing nature of scientific sharing and withholding in academic life sciences research: Trends from national surveys in 2000 and 2013. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical College, Vol. 91, no. 3: 433.
Zuiderwijk, A. and Spiers, H. 2019. Sharing and re-using open data: A case study of motivations in astrophysics. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 49: 228-241. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.024.