Not just nickel-and-dime: An analysis of journal articles winning Ig Nobel prize during 2011–2020

Main Article Content

Andy Wai Kan Yeung


Ig Nobel prize is a satirical award given to achievements that are unusual, imaginative, and frequently produced in the form of journal articles. It was largely unknown how these award-winning articles were disseminated in the community in terms of academic citations and social media attentions. This study evaluated all journal articles winning the award during the period of 2011–2020 for their citation and social media performance metrics. There were 89 Ig Nobel prize-winning journal articles indexed by Scopus. On average, they were cited 42.5 ± 102.4 times, published in journals with mean impact factor of 3.476 ± 4.102, and mentioned 947.3 ± 2887.2 times and 263.2 ± 502.7 times on Facebook and Twitter, respectively. Over half of them were published in the first quartile journals and awarded within 2 years since publication. Though Ig Nobel prize was originally intended to be satirical, prize-winning articles themselves were indeed impactful in the academia.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yeung, A. W. K. (2022). Not just nickel-and-dime: An analysis of journal articles winning Ig Nobel prize during 2011–2020. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 27(1), 93–99.


Barry, J.M., Blank, B. and Boileau, M. 1980. Nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring with stamps. Urology, Vol. 15, no. 2: 171-172. Available at:

Bjork, S., Offer, A. and Söderberg, G. 2014. Time series citation data: The Nobel Prize in economics. Scientometrics, Vol. 98, no. 1: 185-196. Available at:

Eren, M.I., Bebber, M.R., Norris, J.D., Perrone, A., Rutkoski, A., Wilson, M. and Raghanti, M.A. 2019. Experimental replication shows knives manufactured from frozen human feces do not work. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Vol. 27, no.: 102002. Available at:

Farys, R. and Wolbring, T. 2017. Matched control groups for modeling events in citation data: An illustration of Nobel Prize effects in citation networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, no. 9: 2201-2210. Available at:

Frandsen, T.F. and Nicolaisen, J. 2013. The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, no. 3: 437-447. Available at:

Gingras, Y. and Wallace, M.L. 2010. Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007). Scientometrics, Vol. 82, no. 2: 401-412. Available at:

Hart, V., Nováková, P., Malkemper, E.P., Begall, S., Hanzal, V., Ježek, M., Kušta, T., Němcová, V., Adámková, J. and Benediktová, K. 2013. Dogs are sensitive to small variations of the Earth’s magnetic field. Frontiers in Zoology, Vol. 10, no. 80. Available at:

Liang, H., Fung, I.C.-H., Tse, Z.T.H., Yin, J., Chan, C.-H., Pechta, L.E., Smith, B.J., Marquez-Lameda, R.D., Meltzer, M.I. and Lubell, K.M. 2019. How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading? BMC Public Health, Vol. 19, no. 1: 438. Available at:

Mullins, C.H., Boyd, C.J. and Corey, B.L. 2020. Examining the correlation between altmetric score and citations in the general surgery literature. Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 248: 159-164. Available at:

Nadis, S. 1998. French scientist shrugs off winning his second Ig Nobel prize. Nature, Vol. 395, no. 6702: 535-535. Available at:

Nocera, A.P., Boyd, C.J., Boudreau, H., Hakim, O. and Rais-Bahrami, S. 2019. Examining the correlation between altmetric score and citations in the urology literature. Urology, Vol. 134 : 45-50. Available at:

Pilcher, H. 2004. Laughter in the lab. Nature. Available at:

Robinson-García, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J. and Hicks, D. 2017. The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles. PloS One, Vol. 12, no. 8: e0183551. Available at:

Strack, F., Martin, L.L. and Stepper, S. 1988. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54, no. 5: 768-777. Available at:

Wagenmakers, E.-J., Beek, T., Dijkhoff, L., Gronau, Q.F., Acosta, A., Adams Jr, R., Albohn, D., Allard, E., Benning, S.D. and Blouin-Hudon, E.-M. 2016. Registered replication report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 11, no. 6: 917-928. Available at:

Williams, S.A., Terras, M.M. and Warwick, C. 2013. What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. Journal of Documentation, Vol., no.: 384-410. Available at:

Woolston, C. 2014. Ig Nobel prizes provide fun fodder online. Nature. Available at:

Xia, F., Su, X., Wang, W., Zhang, C., Ning, Z. and Lee, I. 2016. Bibliographic analysis of nature based on Twitter and Facebook altmetrics data. PloS one, Vol. 11, no. 12: e0165997. Available at:

Yang, P.J., Lee, A.B., Chan, M., Kowalski, M., Qiu, K., Waid, C., Cervantes, G., Magondu, B., Biagioni, M. and Vogelnest, L. 2021. Intestines of non-uniform stiffness mold the corners of wombat feces. Soft Matter, Vol. 17, no. 3: 475-488. Available at:

Zhang, D., Blazar, P. and Earp, B.E. 2021. Correlation between social media postings and academic citations of hand surgery research publications: A pilot study using Twitter and Google Scholar. The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 46, no.: 1119.e1-1119.e5. Available at: