Main Article Content
Information literacy competency is a crucial asset in the pursuit of knowledge for university students. It is the basis of student-centered learning and the key to academic success. Thus, assessment of students' information literacy will help to enlighten the learning needs of the student in searching, managing, and applying information in the digital era. This study aims to assess the perceived information literacy skills among undergraduate students in the Faculty of Medicine of a public university in Kuala Lumpur. A cross-sectional study was conducted from June to August 2019. The Seven Pillars of Information Skills (SCONUL) was adopted for the measurement of information literacy skills in the present study. The seven pillars are identify, scope, plan, gather, evaluate, manage and present. A total of 315 completed questionnaires consists of four parts: the frequency of searching for information resources; perceived information literacy skills; source of learning and barrier in seeking information. About three-quarters of the students reported a high level of perceived information literacy skills. Among four information literacy domains, literacy on information search is at top of the rank, followed by information communication and dissemination, information processing, and information evaluation. The most frequently searched information resource used was the Internet search engine. The most common source of learning was an information literacy course and, the most common barrier was a limited subscription of full texts article. The students should be encouraged to obtain information from trusted resources such as library online subscribed databases. The students must advance their literacy in information processing and information evaluation. The findings also help to guide the University Library in planning the content for information literacy workshops.
It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.
Abunadi, I. 2018. A technology-dependent information literacy model within the confines of a limited resources environment. Information Technology and Libraries. Vol. 37. no. 4: 119-135.
American Library Association. 2006. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Available at: https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential
Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). 2013. Introduction to Information Literacy. Available at: https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/nursing
Choi, J. and Martinis, J. E. D. 2013. Nursing informatics competencies: assessment of undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing. Vol. 22, no.13-14: 1970-1976.
Armstrong, C., Boden, D., Town, S., Woolley, M., Webber, S. and Abell, A. 2005. Defining information literacy for the UK. Library & Information Update, Vol. 4. no. 1-2: 22-25
Dorvlo, S. S. 2016. Information literacy among postgraduate students of the University of Ghana. Library Philosophy and Practice: 1392. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1392/.
Horvath, D. 2014. Information literacy of non-medical students of first Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague. Revue of Librarianship, Vol. 25. No. 2: 26-57.
Intas, G., P. Kostagiolas, D. Zavras, E. Chalari, P. Stergiannis, G. Toylia, and D. Niakas. 2017. Information-seeking behavior of Greek nursing students: a questionnaire study. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Vol. 35, no. 2: 109-114.
Li, X., Zhang, J.Y., Zheng, Y.X., Wang, Y.X., and Hao, W.N. 2022. Factors associated with information literacy of nursing undergraduates in China. BMC Nursing, Vol. 21, no. 1: 81.
Kim, K. S. and Sei-Ching, J. S. 2011. Selecting quality sources: bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 37, no. 2: 178-188.
Kleyman, E. Z. and Tabaei, S. 2012. Information literacy needs in graduate-level health sciences education. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, Vol. 23, no. 2: 36-41.
Mahdian, M.J. and Shahbazi, S. 2012. Barriers and challenges, taking advantage of new technologies in the field of information literacy from the perspective of faculty members. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 69: 2092-2095.
Mahmood, K. 2013. Relationship of students' perceived information literacy skills with personal and academic variables. Libri, Vol. 63, no. 3: 232-239.
Maranda, S., Harding, B. and Kinderman, L. 2016. Evaluation of the long-term impact of a curriculum-integrated medical information literacy program. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association. Vol. 37. no. 3. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-026.
Olson, K. E., O'Brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., and Charness, N. 2011. Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing International. Vol. 36. no. 1: 123-145.
Pinto, M. 2010. Design of the IL-HUMASS survey on information literacy in higher education: A self-assessment approach. Journal of Information Science. Vol.36. no.1: 86–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551509351198.
Pinto, M. 2011. An approach to the internal facet of information literacy using the IL-HUMASS Survey. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Vol. 37. no. 2: 145-154.
Raosoft. 2004. Raosoft sample size calculator. Available at: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html.
Sackett, D. 1996. Evidence-based medicine - what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. Vol. 312:71-72.
SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries). 1999. Information skills in higher education: A SCONUL position paper. Available at: http://www.sconul.ac.uk/ groups/information_literacy/seven pillars.html.
Wong, L.P., Mohamad Shakir, S.M., Tong, W.T., Alias,H., Aghamohammadi, N. and Arumugam, K. 2018. Awareness, perception and barriers to seeking information from online academic databases and medical journals as sources of information. Informatics for Health and Social Care. Vol. 43, no. 4: 335-347.