Structures of THE, QS and ARWU Top 100 universities’ websites in different languages and social media accounts: Binary matrix approach

Main Article Content

Vladimir M Moskovkin
Munenge - Sizyoongo
He Zhang
Marina V Sadovski

Abstract

The aim of the study is to understand how the diversity of university language websites and social networks influence the universities’ reputation in the World University Rankings and how this diversity can be described. Combining the union of sets of university names in Times Higher Education (THE), QS World University Ranking (QS), and Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) 2018, the World’s Top 100 Universities Rankings enabled us to obtain a set of 146 universities. From October 18, 2018, through November 1, 2018, the availability of website versions in different languages and social media applications was checked. The study enabled a 146x15 binary matrix to be built in the first case, and a 146x21 one in the second, with 15 meaning the number of website versions in foreign languages, and 21 standing for respective number of various social media accounts.  The binary matrices were clustered with a view to obtaining dense submatrices consisting of units only. The study shows that approximately 47 percent of the universities surveyed have their websites in more than one language. All the 146 universities have websites in English, those in Chinese coming second and equalling to 21. Most popular social networking sites have been revealed, with over 84 percent of universities having Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Instagram accounts. On the whole, 18 universities form a dense binary submatrix for 6 social media, including four of the above, as well as LinkedIn and Google+.  The binary matrices are proved to be effective for higher education managers and experts focusing on specific regions and social media. Correlational dependence calculations on comparative analysis of traditional and altmetrics rankings are also performed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moskovkin, V. M., Sizyoongo, M. .-., Zhang, H., & Sadovski, M. V. (2021). Structures of THE, QS and ARWU Top 100 universities’ websites in different languages and social media accounts: Binary matrix approach. Malaysian Journal of Library &Amp; Information Science, 26(2), 37–67. Retrieved from https://mjlis.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/27054
Section
Articles

References

Aguillo, I.F., Ortega, J.L. and Fernánder, M. 2008. Webometric ranking of world universities: Introduction, methodology, and future development. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 33, no. 2: 233 -244. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802254031.

Aicher, T. and Jacob F. 2015. Measuring the degree of corporate social media use. International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 57, no. 2: 257-275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2015-018.

Alcántara-Pilar, J. M. Del Barrio-García, S. and Rodríguez-López, M. E. 2018. Does language matter? A cross-national comparison of the moderating effect of language on website information-processing. Journal of Business Research, no. 88: 66-78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.011.

Almenara, J. C. and Díaz V. M. 2014. Educational possibilities of social networks and group work. University students’ perceptions. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, Vol. 42, no. 42:165-172. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-16.

Argaez, E. D. 2020. Internet world users by language-Top 10 languages. Miniwatts Marketing Group. Available at: https://internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm.

Badea, M. 2014. Social media and organizational communication. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 149, no. 5: 70 – 75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.192.

Boyd, D. M. and Ellison N. B. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.13, no.1: 210-230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.

Chatterjee, A. and Maity A. 2014. Communication of Universities of Asia through Facebook: A study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, Vol. 34, no. 5: 376-383. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.5878.

Clement, J. 2020. Global social networks ranked by number of users 2019. Statista—The Statistics Portal. Available at: https://www. statista. com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users.

Eke, H. N. and Odoh, N. J. 2014. The use of social networking sites among the undergraduate students of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1195. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1195

Gavilan, D., Martinez-Navarro, G. and Fernández-Lores, S. 2017. University students and informational social networks: Total sceptics, dual moderates or pro-digitals. Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, Vol. 53, no. 4: 61-70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-06.

Greenwood, G. 2012. Examining the presence of social media on university web sites. Journal of College Admission, No. 216: 24-28. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ992992.

Fauzi, M. A., Tan, C. N. L., Thurasamy, R. and Ojo, A. O. 2019 Evaluating academics’ knowledge sharing intentions in Malaysian public universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 24, no. 1:123-143. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.7.

Figueira, Á. 2018 Uncovering social media content strategies for worldwide top-ranked universities. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 138: 663-670. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.088.

Freire, F.C., Rogel, D.R. and Rodríguez, C. 2014. Presence and impact of Andean universities in online social networks. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, no. 69: 571-592. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1025en.

Goncalves, P. R. 2018. Correlating the relationship between US News & World Report Rankings and social media efficiency of the Top 10 Ranked private universities at the state level (Massachusetts), the United States and the World (US News & World Report 2019). Journal of Marketing Communications for Higher Education. Vol.1, no.1: 28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6017/jmche.v1i1.10849.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.

Holmberg, K. 2015 Online attention of universities in Finland: Are the bigger universities bigger online too? Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. 29 June - 4 July 2015, Boğaziçi University Istanbul, p. 83-88. Available at: http://issi2015.org/files/downloads/all-papers/0083.pdf.

Hussain, I. A 2012. Study to evaluate the social media trends among university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 64: 639–645. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.075.

Isbulan, O. 2011. Opinions of university graduates about social networks according to their personal characteristics. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, Vol. 10, no. 2: 184-189.

Iskender, E., and Bati, G.B. 2015 Comparing Turkish universities entrepreneurship and innovativeness index's rankings with sentiment analysis results on social media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195: 1543-1552 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.457.

Kane, S. K., Shulman, J. A., Shockley, T. J., and Ladner, R. E. 2007. A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) (pp. 148-156). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/1243441.1243472.

Koblížková, A., and Leeming, D. E. 2016 Striving for higher University World Rankings: The role of the language centre. Linguistics and Literature Studies, Vol.4, no.6: 392-401. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2016.040602.

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A. and Zickuhr, K. 2010. Social media & mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials. Pew Internet & American Life Project, no. 2:51.

Linvill, D. L., McGee, S. E. and Hicks, L. K. 2012. Colleges’ and universities’ use of Twitter: A content analysis. Public Relations Review, Vol. 38 no. 4: 636-638. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.010.

Lovejoy, K. and Saxton, G.D. 2012. Information, community, and action: How non-profit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer – Mediated Communication, Vol.17 no. 3: 337-353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x

Lupton, D. 2014. 'Feeling better connected': Academics’ use of social media. Canberra: News & Media Research Center, University of Canberra. Available at: https://www.canberra.edu.au/about-uc/faculties/arts-design/attachments2/pdf/n-and-mrc/Feeling-Better-Connected-report-final.pdf.

Madden, M. and Zickuhr, K. 2011. 65% of online adults use social networking sites: Women maintain their foothold on SNS use and older Americans are still coming aboard. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/ internet/2011/08/26/65-of-online-adults-use-social-networking-sites/.

Manca, S. 2020. Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 44: 100707. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707.

Mayfield, A. 2008. What is social media? An e-book by Antony Mayfield from iCrossing. Available at: https://tavaana.org/sites/default/files/what-is-social-media-uk.pdf.

Maresova, P., Hruška, J. and Kuca, K. 2020. Social media university branding. Education Sciences, Vol.10, no. 3:74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030074.

Mazurek, G., Górska, A., Korzynski, P. and Silva, S. 2020. Social networking sites and researcher’s success. Journal of Computer Information Systems (Published online: 4 Aug 2020). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2020.1783724.

McCoy, C. G. Nelson, M. L. and Weigle, M. C. 2018. Mining the web to approximate university rankings. Information Discovery and Delivery, Vol. 46, no. 3: 173-183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-05-2018-0014.

Meseguer-Martinez, A., Ros-Galvez, A., Rosa-Garcia and Catalan-Alarcon, A. 2019 Online video impact of world class universities. Electron Markets, Vol.29: 519–532. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0315-4.

Mwanza, G. 2011. Social networks: encouraging collaboration among first year undergraduate students at the University of Cape Town. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Town. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11495.

Moskovkin, V.M., and Yavej, L. 2019. Inoyazychnye sajty i social'nye seti universitetov: faktory povysheniya ih konkurentosposobnosti. Nauchnyj Rezul'tat. Ser. Sociologiya i upravlenie, Vol. 1, no.5 : 109-138. (In Russian). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/inoyazychnye-saity-i-sotsialnye-seti-universitetov-faktory-povysheniya-ih-konkurentosposobnosti.

Moskovkin, V.M. and Chzhan, He. 2019. Postroenie binarnyh matric dlya universitetskih inoyazychnyh sajtov i akkauntov v social'nyh setyah i ih klasterizaciya na primere vedushchih Rossijskih universitetov. Original'nye issledovaniya, no. 4: 63-84. (In Russian). Available at: http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/bitstream/123456789/28116/1 Moskovkin_Postroenie_binarnykh_matrits.pdf.

Neilson, J. 2006. Interview by Matt Mickiewicz. Interview with Jakob Nielson. SitePoint Pty. Ltd., 19 July 2006. Available at: https://www.sitepoint.com/interview-jakob-nielsen/.

Nielson, J. 2010. Scrolling and attention. Available at: 22 Mar. 2010 / Available at: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/scrolling-attention.html.

Obar, J.A. and Wildman, S. 2015. Social media definition and the governance challenge: A introduction to the special issue. Telecommunication Policy, Vol. 39, no. 9: 745-750. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.

Otto, F. and Williams, S. 2014. Official use of Social Network Sites by African Universities. Proceedings of the 2nd Pan African International Conference on Science, Computing and Telecommunications (PACT 2014) July 14 - 18, Arusha, Tanzania, pp.46-51, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAT.2014.7055135.

Permatasari, H. P., Harlena, S., Erlangga, D. and Chandra, R. 2013. Effect of social media on website popularity: Differences between public and private universities in Indonesia. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), Vol. 3, no. 2: 32-37. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1956.

Pluta-Olearnik, M. 2015. The internationalisation of marketing in the Education and Research Sector. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych I Badawczych, Vol. 18, no.4: 77-96. Available at: http://doi.org/10.14611/minib.18.04.2015.10.

Qyanadi, S., Kubota, K. and Nakase, A. 2001. Matrix clustering: A new data mining method for CRM. Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan, Vol. 42, no. 8: 2156 - 2166. (In Japanese)

Saxton D. and Guo, G.D. 2020 Social media capital: Conceptualizing the nature, acquisition, and expenditure of social media-based organizational resources. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 36: 100443 Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100443.

Shah, N. A. K. and Cox, A. M. 2017. Uncovering the scholarly use of Twitter in the academia: Experiences in a British University. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 22, no. 3: 93-108 Available at: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol22no3.6.

Taecharungroj, V. 2017. Higher education social media marketing: 12 content types universities post on Facebook. International Journal of Management in Education, Vol. 11, no. 2:111-127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2017.10002819.

Tomášková, R. 2015. A walk through the multimodal landscape of university websites. Brno Studios in English, Vol. 41, no. 1: 77-100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE.2015-1-5.

Valerio-Ureña, G., Herrera-Murillo, D. and Madero-Gómez, S. 2020. Analysis of the presence of most best-ranked universities on social networking sites. Informatics, Vol. 7, no. 1: (article 9): 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ informatics7010009.

Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., Shaw, A., Pasquini, L. and Woodward, S. 2017 Selective openness, branding, broadcasting, and promotion: Twitter use in Canada’s public universities. Educational Media International, Vol. 54, no. 1:1-19, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1324363.

Venuti, M. and Nasti, Ch. 2015. Italian and UK university websites: Comparing communicative strategies. ESP Across Cultures, Vol. 12: 125-137.

Weinreich, H. Obendorf, H., Herder, E. and Mayer, M. 2008. Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), Vol. 2, no. 1: 1-31.

Woźniak, M. and Buchnowska, D. 2013. The role and use of social media by universities – ranking of universities in social media. Problemy Konwergencji Mediów T.2, ed. M. Kaczmarczyk, D. Rott, Verbum, Sosnowiec – Praga, pp. 319 – 330.

Wright, N. 2010. Twittering in teacher education: Reflecting on practicum experiences. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, Vol.25, no.3: 259-265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.512102