APPLICATION SHIFTING THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN SYARIAH CRIMINAL CASES UNDER THE SYARIAH COURT EVIDENCE ENACTMENT IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Suhaizad Saifuddin National University of Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Hanifah Haydar Ali Tajuddin National University of Malaysia, Malaysia

Keywords:

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment, burden of proof, shifting the burden of proof, exception the burden of proof, syariah court

Abstract

Burden of proof is one of the significant aspects in the Syariah Court Evidence Enactment. Inaccurate application of burden of proof and shifting the burden of proof could affect a just handling and outcome of a case. Brief analysis found that the inaccuracy issues seemed to be caused by misunderstandings and different interpretations among the Syariah law practitioners. Thus, the objective of this paper is to mainly identify the legal provisions relating to burden of proof and shifting the burden of proof in the Syariah Court Evidence Enactment. Besides, the paper also aims to analyse cases in the Syariah court that considered issues relating to the application of burden of proof and shifting the burden of proof in syariah criminal cases. The paper adopts the legal research methodology based on the doctrinal and qualitative approach. The data is gathered through library research and documentation, which are then analysed applying critical content analysis methods. The paper finds that there are misunderstandings and different interpretation among the Syariah law practitioners relating to the application of burden of proof and its shift in syariah criminal cases. The paper is essential in explaining the application of the legal provisions relating to burden of proof and its shift in the Syariah Court Evidence Enactment. The paper will also identify issues that relate to misunderstandings among the Syariah law practitioners and subsequently, suggest improvements that can be implemented to increase the understanding among the Syariah law practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adibah Bahori, Azizah Mat Rashid, Mohamad Azhan Yahya, Suhaizad Saifuddin & Mohd Kamel Mat Salleh (2023). Evidence and prosecution of out-of-wedlock pregnancies: A legal perspective of Syariah criminal offences in Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, 1-30.

Ahmad Ibrahim Bek (2003). Turuq al-Ithbat al-Syar’iyyah. Misr: Maktabah al-Azhariah al-Turath.

Al-Bukhari (1997). Sahih Al-Bukhari ma’ Hashiyat Al-Sindi. Bayrut: Maktabah Al- ‘Asriyyah.

Jal Zabdi Mohd Yusoff (2003). Pengenalan Undang-undang Keterangan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

Mohd Salleh Hj. Md. @ Haji Ahmad (2003). Al-Bayyinah dan Beban Pembuktian: Teori dan Amalan di Mahkamah Syariah dalam Yaakob, A.M. Pendakwaan dan Penyiasatan Konsep dan Amalan, 235-262. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia.

Muhammad Mustafa Zuhaili (1982). Wasail Ithbat fi al-Syariah al-Islamiah fi al-Muamalat al-Madaniyyah wa al-Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah. Damsyik: Maktabah Dar Al- Bayan.

Ramalinggam (2017) Skop Seksyen 45 Akta Keterangan 1950: Keperluan Untuk Semakan Semula. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, Isu Khas 1-14.

Ruzman Md. Noor & Istajib Mokhtar (2011). Ulasan Kes dari Aspek Pembuktian: Rosmah binti Suly & anor lwn Ismail bin Mohamad & anor, Jurnal Hukum, 32(2) 223-248.

Ruzman Md. Noor (2007). Pembuktian dalam kes Harta Sepencarian di Mahkamah Syariah di Malaysia, Jurnal Syariah ,15(1), 29-42.

Ruzman Md. Noor (2008). Kedudukan Bayyinah, Syahadah dan Qarinah dalam Penggubalan Undang-undang Keterangan Islam di Malaysia, Jurnal Syariah, 16(2), 345-366.

Sarkar Subodh Chandra (2016). Sarkar Evidence of Law in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Ceylon, Malaysia & Singapore. Selangor: Lexis Nexis.

Suhaizad Saifuddin (2021). Peruntukan Beban Pembuktian di bawah Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah: Satu Penilaian. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 28, 78-91.

Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ahmad ‘Azam Mohd Shariff, Mohd. Helmi Md. Said, (2020). Application of prima facie case at the end of prosecution case in the syariah criminal justice: Issues and solutions. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 5(1), 395-413.

Suhaizad Saifuddin, Ahmad ‘Azam Mohd Shariff, Mohd. Helmi Md. Said (2022). Keterangan Jenayah Syariah di Malaysia Pemakaian Beban dan Darjah Pembuktian. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Suhaizad Saifuddin, Hanifah Haydar Ali Tajuddin, Mohamad Azhan Yahya, Mohamad Rizal Abd Rahman & Fatimah Yusro Hashim (2024). Examining The Application of Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and Common Law in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 12(1), 11-22.

Zulfakar Ramlee (2015). Pembuktian dalam Kes Jenayah Syariah Malaysia: Isu dan Penyelesaian, Jurnal Kanun, 27(1),122-142.

List of Statutes

Syariah Court Evidence Act (Federal Territories) 1997

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment (Kedah) 2014

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment (Kelantan) 2002

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment (Perak) 2004

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment (Perlis) 2006

Syariah Court Evidence Enactment (Terengganu) 2001

List of Cases

Ketua Pendakwa Syarie Kedah v Rodziah Ismail & 2 Ors [Criminal Appeal Case No: 02000-102-0001-2007].

Ketua Pendakwa Syarie Selangor v Ahmad Munawar Zakaria, [Criminal Case No:10400-1140-0003-2019].

Pendakwa Syarie Kelantan v Mat Rahim Saman & anor [1995] X (I) JH, 110

Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sembilan v Hammirul Hamlen [Criminal Case No: 05001-114-0022-2015.

Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sembilan v Mohd Amin Mohd Zin & anor, Syariah Criminal Case No: 05500-114-1052-2009 & 05500-114-1051-2009

Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sembilan v Mohd. Nor bin Wahab [Criminal Case No: 05002-138-0001-2016].

Pendakwa Syarie Negeri Sembilan v Rahim bin Ramli [Criminal Case No: 10400-1140-0003-2019

Pendakwa Syarie Selangor v Abdul Kahar bin Ahmad [2009] 29(1) JH 100

Pendakwa Syarie Selangor v Sukree bin Masuyu [2008] 3 ShLR 172

Pendakwa Syarie Wilayah Persekutuan v Abdul Samathu Alil Rahman [Criminal Case No: 14300-138-0023-2010]

Pendakwa Syarie Wilayah Persekutuan v Zulkifli Othman [Syariah Criminal Case No:14100-143-0017-2017].

Wan Azrul Abdullah v Ketua Pendakwa Syarie Pulau Pinang [2014] 1 ShLR 13

Published

2024-06-30