Who really contributes to information science research? An analysis of disciplinarity and nationality of contributors to ten top journals

Main Article Content

Brady D. Lund

Abstract

Understanding the shifts in contributions to the discipline of Information Science, and its subdisciplines/specialties of Library Science and Information Science, is important for researchers, educators, and advocates in this field. This study analyzes the disciplinary and national affiliations of authors in ten top Information Science journals from 2015-2019. Findings indicate that significant discrepancies exist among the authorship of journals examined, with journals like Journal of Documentation having a large majority of authors from Library and Information Science schools, while journals like Information Processing and Management have only a small number of computers from Library and Information Science relative to disciplines such as computer science. Nationality findings indicate that Europe, North America, and Asia have significant representation in these Information Science publications, though developing countries are severely underrepresented compared to developed countries. These findings highlight significant discrepancies in contributions to Information Science research and the need for more Library and Information Science contributors, particularly from developing countries. International and interdisciplinary collaboration may be particularly helpful in achieving this goal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
D. LUND, Brady. Who really contributes to information science research? An analysis of disciplinarity and nationality of contributors to ten top journals. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 15-29, dec. 2020. ISSN 1394-6234. Available at: <https://mjlis.um.edu.my/article/view/27806>. Date accessed: 11 apr. 2021.
Section
Articles

References

Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., and Zainab, A. N. 2015. LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: A state preference study. Scientometrics, Vol. 102: 1083-1099.

Adkins, D. and Budd, J. 2006. Scholarly productivity of US LIS faculty. Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 28, no. 3: 374-389.

Aharony N. 2012. Library and information science research areas: A content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 44, no. 1: 27-35.

Budd, J. M. 2000. Scholarly productivity of US LIS faculty: An update. The Library Quarterly, Vol. 70, no. 2: 230-245.

Budd, J. M. 2015. Productivity of US LIS and iSchool faculty. Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 37, no. 4: 290-295.

Budd, J. M. and Seavey, C. A. 1996. Productivity of US library and information science faculty: The Hayes study revisited. The Library Quarterly, Vol. 66, no. 1: 1-20.

Chang, Y. 2018. Examining interdisciplinarity of library and information science based on LIS articles contributed by non-LIS authors. Scientometrics, Vol. 116, No. 3: 1589-1613.

Chang, Y. 2019. Are articles in library and information science journals primarily contributed to by LIS authors? Scientometrics, Vol. 121, no. 1: 81-104.

Davarpanah, M. and Aslekia, S. 2008. A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, Vol. 77, no. 1: 21-39.

Galbraith, Q., Smart, E., Smith, S. D., and Reed, M. 2014. Who publishes in top-tier Library Science journals? An analysis by faculty status and tenure. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 75, no. 5: 724-735.

Huang, M. and Chang, Y. 2012. A comparative study of interdisciplinary changes between information science and library science. Scientometrics, Vol. 91, no. 3: 789-803.

Huang, M. H., Whaw, W. C., and Lin, C. S. 2019. One category, two communities: Subfield differences in “Information Science and Library Science” in Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, Vol. 119: 1059-1079.

Manzari, L. 2013. Library and information sicnece journal prestige as assessed by library and information science faculty. The Library Quarterly, Vol. 83, no. 1: 42-60.

Meho, L. I. and Spurgin, K. M. 2005. Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 56, no. 12: 1314-1331.

Odell, J. and Gabbard, R. 2008. The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science, 1996-2004: A journal-to-journal citation analysis. College and Research Libraries, Vol. 69, no. 6: 546-569.

Park, T. K. 2008. Asian and Pacific region authorship characteristics in library and information science journals. Serials Review, Vol. 34, no. 4: 243-251.

Prebor, G. 2010. Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Vol. 42, no. 4: 256-267.

Salton, G. 1973. On the development of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 24, no. 3: 218-220.

Schlogl, C., and Stock, W. 2008. Practitioners and academics as authors and readers. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 64, no. 5: 643-666.

Sethi, B. and Panda, K. C. 2012. Growth and nature of international LIS research: An analysis of two journals. The International Information and Library Review, Vol. 44, no. 2: 86-99.

United Nations. 2014. Country classification. Available at un.org/en/development/desa/ policy.

Urbano, C. and Ardanuy, J. 2020. Cross-disciplinary collaboration versus coexistence in LIS serials: Analysis of authorship affiliations in four European countries. Scientometrics, Vol. 124: 575-602.

Walters, W. H. and Wilder, E. I. 2015. Worldwide contributors to the literature of library and information science: top authors, 2007–2012. Scientometrics, Vol. 103, no. 1: 301-327.