The effects of work task difficulty on health information searching behaviour

Article Sidebar

FULLTEXT
Published: May 11, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no1.4
Keywords:
Interactive Information Searching Behavior Interactive Information Retrieval Service personalization Health information, Health ambassadors

Main Article Content

Abolfazl Taheri
Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-3425
Omid Yousefianzadeh
Department of Health Information Technology and Management, Health Technology Assessment and Medical Informatics Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-6614
Marzieh Saeedizadeh
Knowledge and Information Science, Public Libraries Foundation, Shiraz
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-0741

Abstract

Information needs and information seeking processes depend on contextual factors. Identifying and paying attention to contextual factors such as work tasks can be helpful for personalization of information retrieval. This study aimed to determine the relationship between work task difficulty and interactive health information searching behaviour (HISB). The study was performed through an analysis of transaction logs to identify relation between the work task difficulty and HISB of postgraduate student health ambassadors (PSHB). Thirty participants were purposefully sampled and invited to complete four simulated work tasks. User perception of work task difficulty, satisfaction, and success of search process were measured using questionnaires. A total of 120 log files were analysed. The results showed that with increasing tasks difficulty, PSHB see more results pages, review more information items and finally save more documents. Also, with increasing difficulty, PSHB enter more and longer queries in information retrieval systems and, in addition to changing the query more, they use more keywords and longer queries to search. As the task difficulty increases, the rate of satisfaction and success, as well as the navigational speed decrease. Understanding how work task attributes affect HISB can be effective for designers of interactive information retrieval systems, and developers of personalized health information retrieval systems and recommendation systems based on contextual information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taheri, A., Yousefianzadeh, O., & Saeedizadeh, M. (2023). The effects of work task difficulty on health information searching behaviour. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 28(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no1.4
Issue
Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science
Section
Articles

It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to the journal have not been published, accepted for publication, nor simultaneously submitted for publication elsewhere. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) agree that copyright for the article is transferred to the publisher, if and when the manuscript is accepted for publication.

References

Aula, A., Khan, R. M., and Guan, Z. 2010. How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 35-44).

Borlund, P. 2000. Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56, no. 1: 71-90.

Britt, T. W. 2005. The effects of identity-relevance and task difficulty on task motivation, stress, and performance. Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 29, no. 3: 189-202.

Broussard, R., and Zhang, Y. 2013. Seeking treatment options: Consumers' search behaviors and cognitive activities. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 50, no. 1: 1-10.

Byström, K. and Järvelin, K. 1995. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 31: 191-213.

Crescenzi, A., Capra, R., and Arguello, J. 2013. Time pressure, user satisfaction and task difficulty. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 50, no. 1: 1-4.

Gwizdka, J. 2009. Assessing cognitive load on web search tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1001.1685. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1001/1001.1685.pdf.

Gwizdka, J. and Spence, I. 2006. What can searching behavior tell us about the difficulty of information tasks? A study of Web navigation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 43, no. 1: 1-22.

Hertzum, M. and Hansen, P. 2019. Empirical studies of collaborative information seeking: A review of methodological issues. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 75, no. 1: 140-163.

Hu, X. and Kando, N. 2017. Task complexity and difficulty in music information retrieval. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 68, no. 7: 1711-1723.

Huang, K., Chen, J., Liu, C. and Zhang, L. 2020. A Comparative study of the relationship between the subjective difficulty, objective difficulty of search tasks and search behaviors. JCDL’20: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, pp. 421-424. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Ingwersen, P. 1992. Information retrieval interaction (Vol. 246). London: Taylor Graham.

Inthiran, A., Alhashmi, S. M. and Ahmed, P. K. 2015. A user study on the information search behaviour of medical students. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, Vol. 20, no. 1: 61-77.

Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D. and Huntington, P. 2005. The use and users of scholarly e‐journals: a review of log analysis studies. Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 57, no. 6: 554-571.

Kelly, D. 2009. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 3, no. (1–2): 1-224.

Kim, J. 2006. Task difficulty as a predictor and indicator of web searching interaction. CHI EA ‘06: CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 959-964. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery

Kim, K. S. and Allen, B. 2002. Cognitive and task influences on Web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, no. 2: 109-119.

Lambert, S. D. and Loiselle, C. G. 2007. Health information seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 17, no. 8: 1006-1019.

Li, Y., and Belkin, N. J. 2010. An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, Vol. 61, no. 9: 1771-1789.

Liu, C., Liu, J., Cole, M., Belkin, N. J. and Zhang, X. 2012. Task difficulty and domain knowledge effects on information search behaviors. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 49, no. 1: 1-10.

Liu, J., and Kim, C. S. 2013. Why do users perceive search tasks as difficult? Exploring difficulty in different task types. HCIR’13: Proceedings of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval, pp. 1-10. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Liu, J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C. and Belkin, N. J. 2010. Predicting task difficulty for different task types. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 47, no. 1: 1-10.

Liu, J., Kim, C. S. and Creel, C. 2015. Exploring search task difficulty reasons in different task types and user knowledge groups. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 51, no. 3: 273-285.

Liu, J., Liu, C., and Belkin, N. J. 2020. Personalization in text information retrieval: A survey. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 71, no. 3: 349-369.

Marchionini, G. 2006. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communication of the ACM, Vol. 49, no. 4: 41–46.

Mu, X., Lu, K. and Ryu, H. 2010. Search strategies on a new health information retrieval system. Online Information Review, Vol. 34, no. 3: 440-456.

Orvis, K. A., Horn, D. B. and Belanich, J. 2008. The roles of task difficulty and prior videogame experience on performance and motivation in instructional videogames. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 24, no. 5: 2415-2433.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 42, no. 5: 533–544.

Pang, P. C. I., Verspoor, K., Chang, S. and Pearce, J. 2015. Conceptualising health information seeking behaviours and exploratory search: result of a qualitative study. Health and Technology, Vol. 5, no. 1: 45-55.

Peters, T.A., Kurth, M., Flaherty, P., Sandore, B. and Kaske, N.K. 1993. An introduction to the special section on transaction log analysis. Library Hi Tech, Vol. 11, no.2:38-40.

Pudaruth, S., Gunputh, R. P., Soyjaudah, K. M. S., and Domun, P. 2016. A question answer system for the Mauritian judiciary. 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2016, pp. 201-205, Available at: doi: 10.1109/ISCMI.2016.47.

Shakiba, E., Shahabadi, S., Marzbani, B. and Eayvazi, N.B.P. 2021. The effect of self-care training for health ambassadors on the number of doctor appointment due to the treatment of minor ailments. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, Vol. 9, no. 1:68-79.

Shao, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Mao, J., Zhang, M. and Ma, S. 2021. Investigating user behavior in legal case retrieval. SIGIR ‘21: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 962-972. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Soares, M. A. C. and Parreiras, F. S. 2020. A literature review on question answering techniques, paradigms and systems. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, Vol. 32, no. 6: 635-646.

Vakkari, P. 2000. Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: A longitudinal case study. RIAO’ 00: Content-Based Multimedia Information Access, Vol. 1: 894-907. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/2835865.2835955.

Van Velsor, E., McCauley, C. D. and Ruderman, M. N. 2010. The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wu, W. C., Kelly, D., Edwards, A. and Arguello, J. 2012. Grannies, tanning beds, tattoos and NASCAR: evaluation of search tasks with varying levels of cognitive complexity. IIIX’12: Proceedings of the 4th Information Interaction in Context Symposium, August 2012, pp. 254-257. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Yilma, T. M., Inthiran, A., Reidpath, D. D. and Orimaye, S. O. 2019. Context-based interactive health information searching. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, Vol. 24, no. 2. Available at: https://www.informationr.net/ir/24-2/paper815.html.

Zareipour, M., Jadgal, M.S. and Movahed, E. 2020. Health ambassadors role in self-care during COVID-19 in Iran. Journal of Military Medicine. Vol. 22, no. 6: 672-674. Available at: https://www.magiran.com/paper/2180774/?lang=en.

Zhang, Y. 2011. Exploring a web space for consumer health information: implications for design. iConference ‘11: Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, Seattle Washington, February 18-11 2011, pp. 811-812. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Heaton, A. and Winkler, H. 2012. Health information searching behavior in MedlinePlus and the impact of tasks. IHI 12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, January 2012, pp. 641-650. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

Zhao, Y. and Zhang, J. 2017. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Information & Libraries Journal, Vol. 34, no. 4: 268-83.